|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Background
Until recently, in the absence of a specific marketing authorisation, patients who failed a TNFa inhibitor (anti-TNFa) therapy switched to another TNF a inhibitor. No specific study has been conducted on this specific population treated in 2nd and subsequent lines, so that resources consumption of this population was unknown. In order to feed a budget impact model (EULAR 2007 - Poster SAT0024) an observational study has been developed.
Objective
To establish the total direct medical cost of patients in second-line anti-TNFa therapy from the French health care system perspective and to assess whether the three treatments marketed in France - infliximab (INF), etanercept (ETA) and adalimumab (ADA) - are administered with respect to the clinical practice recommendations.
![]() |